Almost
eight years ago now – man, has it been that long? – I was walking down
St. Hubert Street in Montreal, Canada, wondering why in the name of Pete
there was a strip club sandwiched between a cigar shop and a Foot
Locker. Maybe, I thought, it was so professionals in the business
district could knock off for lunch, buy a new pair of boots, and suck
down a tasty Cuban while enjoying a lap dance from a fetching young
vixen named Desire. And perhaps Desire is a down-on-her-luck grad
student working her way toward a PhD in mid-17th Century contortionism.
Dr. Desire. Now there’s a
thought.
Lost
in this reverie, strolling near an intersection with a group of
friends, I heard a voice behind me, gruff and authoritative.
“Gimme all your money.”
These are words that will snap a man back into the present.
No
one wants to hear that phrase, especially on vacation in a foreign
country, when sustaining an existence turns briefly into a high-wire
act, and every five-dollar note is a potential beaver shot glass. The
objective on such trips is twofold: Building memories through good times
and merriment, and not losing your shirt to a random hoodlum outside a
Disney Store.
For
a moment, I thought the second clause of this noble mission statement
was about to be violated. Then I turned around, saw the owner of the
voice, and noticed that he was pointing a piece of fruit at me.
I was being robbed at banana-point.
The
man must have seen the confusion on my face, because he immediately
lowered the banana and smiled in a shy, forgive-me manner that was
momentarily disarming. “Naw, I’m just kidding,” he said. “Just foolin’
around. But if you could please spare some change, I’d really appreciate
it.”
In that instant, I thought two things. One: I’m really glad you’re not speaking French to me right now. Two: You bastard.
It
was simultaneously a mean trick and a funny prank, so it was unclear to
me what my reaction should be. I could either toss the guy a coin or
slug him in the kisser. Both seemed appropriate.
The
odd encounter was an extreme example of the decision we have to make
whenever we meet someone who’s obviously struggling. We either give them
money or we don’t. Seems simple enough on the surface.
Only it isn’t always.
To
give or not to give – that, to paraphrase the Bard, is the question,
and these diametrically opposite actions each have strong proponents.
Both camps, frankly, have a point. Camp One says that we shouldn’t give
money to homeless people because they’re likely to spend it on fifths of
Johnny Walker, and nobody turns their life around when they’re half in
the bag, serenading park pigeons with watery renditions of “California
Dreamin’.” Camp Two says that we have an obligation to help our fellow
brothers and sisters – that some circumstances are too difficult to
overcome with hard work and determination alone. These are each valid
arguments. Picking one is like choosing between Justin Bieber and One
Direction. There’s no clear winner, and both feel wrong.
One
group that will always get my money is street performers, and I’ve got
to admit, I’m a sucker for this stuff. The last time I was in Boston, I
was walking through downtown – dutifully following the Freedom Trail,
lest I get lost in a random alleyway filled with used book stands and
animal pee – when I saw some acrobats leaping and gyrating in front of
Quincy Market. With an eager crowd encircling them, the acrobats
solicited volunteers, situated them in the middle of the circle, and
took turns flipping and spinning over their heads, in some cases missing
them by the length of an aardvark nipple. It was a pretty entertaining
spectacle, and this is coming from a guy who’s been jaded by YouTube
videos of skateboarding injuries and gratuitous crotch punches.
Satisfied, I dropped some money into an empty guitar case and went on my
way.
But
that’s different. These are people who are A), probably not homeless,
and B), providing a show in exchange for my loose cash. The decision to
give money in this situation is an easy one. Heck, if I’m going to stop
and ogle them when I should be out downing beers or buying tacky Red Sox
Bobbleheads, then it’s an obligation, really.
What
makes handouts to the homeless such a dilemma is that it’s not an obligation. It’s a choice based
purely on our personalities, our propensity to trust, and in some cases,
circumstance. There’s no guidebook, no guarantee that you’re doing the
right thing.
It’s
wishy-washy to chalk the whole thing up to one big crapshoot, and to
advocate for one’s “best judgment” – a milquetoast phrase if ever there
was one – but we’re left with little choice. In larger cities
especially, we’re bombarded with outstretched hands, whether those of
individuals or the big-box stores all clamoring for our money. Making
the right call 100 percent of the time is impossible without a crystal
ball, or the fantastical soothsaying powers of a comic book mutant. I’d
like to think the unfortunate soul with upturned palms really is a
hard-luck case and not some well-fed charlatan; I’d like to think my
dollar will go toward food, or something else that will genuinely help. I
retain this optimism because, during the more difficult stretches of my
own life, there’s been no better feeling, no more healing balm, than
the kindness and understanding of others. Heck, maybe I’m a sucker. But
I’m cynical enough already without relinquishing my claim to empathy.
It
took me a while to decide on what to do with Banana Man. Ideally, I’d
like something in return for my money, and this guy was on thin ice
already, having put quite the scare into our little clan. Then the
“walk” light started blinking at our intersection, my friends began
crossing the street, and it hit me: I was getting something. I flipped him a dollar coin without
saying a word, and turned to face the cotton-candy lights of the city.
I
was getting an anecdote, see. It’s not too often you get fake-robbed by
fruit. Nearly a decade later, I milked it for a column.
And you know what? That’s worth a dollar.
No comments:
Post a Comment