In
Norse mythology and Scandinavian folklore, a troll is a squat, humanoid
creature who lives in a cave and hides beneath a bristly bush of
coarse whiskers. They’re mischievous little suckers and are rarely
helpful to humans, rather taking pleasure in seeing us upset or besieged
by hardship. Kinda sounds like an evil Danny DeVito character, but
nope. Trolls.
That’s
in mythology. But trolls exist in real life. Oh yes. Click on any
article on any news site, view any video on YouTube, and scroll down
to the bottom of the page to see the comments section. There they are.
Spouting racist remarks, engaging in wanton stupidity, and making
controversial statements solely to upset people and send them into a
frothing tizzy. Where once they lived under bridges,
trolls now make their home on the internet; it’s their cave, and
anonymity is their beard.
They must be stopped.
Take
one comment posted under a recent news item about Hillary Clinton’s
email woes. The article, entitled “Clinton calls on FBI to release
‘full and complete facts’ about email probe,” and posted on Yahoo, is
about what you’d expect: A play-by-play of the newest revelations found
in Wikileaks’ latest trove of formerly top-secret emails. News like this
inspires a lot of conversation and heated
debate, as it should. A robust conversation is one of the cornerstones
on which the democracy is founded, and besides, tense debates make
dinner with the family a lot more interesting. Without them, we’d just
robotically shovel cold pasta salad into our mouths
and try to pick out patterns on Grandma Betty’s ill-advised dining room
wallpaper. “Look, I see an Egyptian pharaoh dunking a basketball into
an aquarium filled with sea otters!” Ugh. Nobody needs that.
Online
comments are a travesty, though, siphoning out any lingering traces of
rational thought and replacing it with the kind of playground
banter you’d expect from either third-grade delinquents or major-party
presidential candidates. Here’s a comment on that article from a poster
calling himself Basil: “LET'S SEE IS MICHELLE STANDS BY HR SIE WITH THIS
MESS- CAN'T GO MUCH LOWER CAN YA.”
Oh, Basil. You had me at Caps Lock.
Let’s
pick this one apart, shall we? First of all, this Basil fella has
clearly never heard of punctuation. Now, maybe it’s that I’m studying
to become an English teacher, or that I write for a living. Maybe it’s
simply that, in a pinch, I have two brain cells left over in the ol’
noggin that I could rub together to start a fire. Whatever the case, the
lack of any periods or commas immediately undermines
any impact Basil is hoping to achieve here. Heck, I was feeling
generous and gave him a period at the end, free of charge. One wonders
if he was actually attempting a sentence or, in a fit or rage, got into a
physical altercation with his keyboard. I’m a little
ashamed to admit it, but I kind of hope the keyboard won.
Second,
the typos. So many typos in such a short span. Everyone makes a typo
once in awhile. Nobody’s perfect, except maybe Bruce Wayne and
the guy from the Dos Equis ads. But nowadays, computers are pretty
smart. They’re generous enough to underline our typos with red squiggly
lines so gaudy their light could be used on runways to help land
passenger jets. Even if Basil never developed the habit
of proofreading -- which is a pretty safe bet -- seems to me he would
have noticed that his sentence was festooned with more lights than a
cruise ship. HR? SIE? These are not words. They are acronyms for human
resources and Scottish Institute for Enterprise,
respectively.
Third, his argument. There isn’t much there to chew on. Should I go into why? Forget it, I’m skipping this one.
There
are two possible reasons why Basil’s sentence turned out the way it
did. Either the last book he read was “Horton Hears a Who,” or he’s
coming across this way intentionally, snickering as he lays the bait,
and flat-out guffawing when otherwise normal people respond with the
expected condescension and outrage. If it’s the former, well, one more
reason why more cash needs to be pumped into the
educational system.
If it’s the latter, he’s a troll.
Pernicious
little creatures, these trolls. On the surface they seem fairly
harmless, shouting into a million tiny black voids tucked under
news items and videos of dogs catching frisbees. Avoiding them is a
fairly simple task -- just skip over the comments section. They’re
repositories for humanity’s worst instincts. But that’s easier said than
done, especially if you’re a young person who spends
any chunk of your free time online. The example I cited is fairly tame,
someone who may or may not be trying to get a rise out of people with
choreographed idiocy. Trolls can be meaner, more cutting. They can
infiltrate a teenager’s Facebook feed and inundate
them with disparaging remarks, leading to emotionally or physically
destructive behavior. They can spread hatred and ignorance. They can
kill.
Scandinavian
lore describes trolls as kidnappers and usurpers of family farms and
estates; they could only be struck down with lighting, as
wielded by the god Thor. We need a Thor for these new trolls -- someone
with a giant hammer who can lay the everloving smackdown on these
cretins. At its best, the internet is a media and communications tool
that makes our friends a little closer and the world
a little smaller. At its worst, it’s a reflection of our ugliness and
judgement, a means by which trolls can crawl out of the shadows and
hijack any inclinations we have toward civility and discourse.
No comments:
Post a Comment