Ben
Franklin never served as president, never took up arms during war, and
never held public office outside of the old Pennsylvania Assembly, which
was essentially a subsidiary of the British Parliamentary system. Yet
he’s on the $100 bill. Not bad for a guy who looked like a dope-smoking
sock puppet.
I’m
reading historian H.W. Brands’ biography of Franklin at the moment, and
contained therein is no shortage of reasons why he deserves such
prominence in our nation’s collective memory. The dude was pretty boss.
He was a printer, writer, statesman, scientist and inventor, and by all
accounts, was a blast to hang out with; I can imagine few more
pleasurable evenings than playing checkers with ol’ Ben in front of a
roaring fire while he regales me with stories about kings and diplomats –
and, as he called them, “low women.” “Low women” is 18th Century code
for “hookers,” and serves as evidence that the founding fathers could
find tactful ways of conversing about almost anyone and anything. I
wonder how Franklin would have described a colonoscopy. A “voluntary
intrusion of the dark recesses of a gentleman’s nether region,” perhaps.
Yet another reason why we need to build a time machine.
While
reading, though, a thought struck me. Say Franklin had been born not in
1706, but 2006. Would he have been able to garner such widespread
acclaim as a thinker and renaissance man?
Methinks not.
For
one thing, there was the languorous pace of colonial life. Not that
people weren’t industrious and hard working, but when a trip from
Philadelphia to Boston required a month off from work and a knock-kneed
horse named Gimpy, there was plenty of time to explore one’s interests.
Heck, if I had four weeks of undisturbed repose, I could write a mystery
novel, build a model ship, and still have a couple of days left over to
choreograph a musical number for the Ice Capades. Shackled by the
modern world’s insistence on immediacy, I’ve hardly got time to buy
socks. The ones I’m wearing have more holes than an Oliver Stone plot.
(Zing!)
It
was a also a simpler time, and in simpler times, it was easier for one
person to make a difference. That’s not meant to take anything away from
Franklin – he was indisputably a genius, well deserving of his
lump-faced money mug. But many of his revolutionary achievements were in
the arena of physics; with that field now wrung dry of intuitive
insights accessible to the layman, further scientific advancements
require Jetsons-level technology, the kind of gadgetry only possible via
the work of teams of engineers and scientists. The days of lone
experimenters shouting “Eureka!” in their basements are largely gone.
The last time it happened was probably when Vince Offer invented the
ShamWow, and while it’s nice to clean up beer spills without
soak-through, it seems farfetched to assume his likeness will be
immortalized in any bronze statues. Maybe if he goes on to convince
Vladimir Putin to put a damn shirt on. If Offer can rid the world of
those jiggling man-bosoms, he can replace FDR on the dime.
It’s
funny. When you look at some of Franklin’s inventions, it’s almost
shocking how even the uninitiated can attest to their overwhelming
logic. Take the Franklin stove. Until its conception, fireplaces were
relatively wide-open contraptions that blew through wood like a rock
star blows through cocaine. Then along came Benny-boy with his big Benny
brain and a design that made it more efficient – an enclosed
compartment for the wood, and a hollow baffle near the rear that more
effectively spread heat throughout a room. It produced more warmth and
less smoke, but was notable for another reason: It was arguably the
first modern attempt at increasing fuel efficiency. A chord went much
further than it did previously. Good news for our New England-dwelling
forebears; at that time, their only alternatives for surviving brutal
winters were violent squat thrusts and setting themselves on fire.
Neither of which are viable options when you’ve got dinner guests.
The
stove, lumped in with a million other achievements, gained him
widespread acclaim. Flash forward 300 years, and it’s difficult to
envision that happening; lone inventors typically settle for getting
most of their attention from television infomercials. Instead of
immortality in the history books, they get three easy installments of
$19.99 from third-shift shut-ins and insomniacs with mustard stains on
their underwear.
This
isn’t to discourage a lone person from fighting against the crowded
echo chamber of modern life. The idea that one man or woman can make an
impact is central to great policy ideas, innovative works of literature,
and the increasingly complicated routines of jugglers on unicycles. But
in the area of invention, there are too many people already thronging
the stage. The next Franklin stove – that must-have innovation which
changes the way we live – will likely be the dominion of big business,
or groups of university scientists working to unlock the complex secrets
of nature. Franklin’s was a single mind left free to roam by the luxury
of time; of all the luxuries we’ve gained in the intervening centuries,
that’s one we’ve left behind.
Perhaps
some visionary soul is still out there who’s got the grit and chutzpa
to land their portrait on a bill, a spectral game-changer tucked into
peoples’ wallets. They’ll just have to do something extraordinary and
without precedent – like finally building that time machine. If that
person exists, they’d better hurry up. I’ve heard Franklin was pretty
good at checkers, and I wanna see if I can beat him.
No comments:
Post a Comment